Career Construction Theory: Shaping Fulfilling Professional Paths in an Evolving Landscape Overview

Career construction theory (CCT) offers a flexible and comprehensive model that illustrates how people dynamically form and attribute individual significance to their professional actions and encounters. Largely pioneered by Mark L. Savickas, this approach refines and updates Donald Super's foundational concepts of career growth, making them suitable for a worldwide, diverse community and a job sector marked by swift technological shifts and unstable employment patterns [1]. Unlike older models that mainly concentrated on pairing unchanging personal characteristics with particular job settings, CCT sees professional journeys as highly personal tales that people develop via continuous interpersonal exchanges, thoughtful introspection, and flexible adjustments to various life hurdles and prospects [2]. This storytelling method highlights the framework's focus on self-determination, where individuals act not as inactive followers of career routes but as engaged creators who blend previous recollections, ongoing situations, and upcoming goals into unified life accounts that direct their work-related decisions [3]. Essentially, CCT tackles three core concerns: Which professional directions do people choose and follow? In what ways do they adjust to different employment positions and changes? And what makes specific occupational routes hold deep personal relevance? By moving the emphasis from fixed attributes to evolving mechanisms, CCT enables individuals to skillfully handle professional interruptions, shifts, and advancement chances in today's employment environment [4]. CCT addresses the processes and outcomes of individuals' efforts to meet their own and others' expectations of successful work life and career, including preparing for, initiating, and participating in their roles on the job, as well as effectively addressing work demands, work transitions, and work disruptions [5]. This discussion examines the framework's background roots, essential elements, main assertions, uses in guidance and related fields, supporting studies along with evaluations, and latest advancements up to 2025, drawing from a broad range of sources to deliver a straightforward, approachable, and detailed summary for experts, scholars, and learners [6].

 Origins and Progression

CCT’s foundations stem from Donald Super’s life-span, life-space model, which initially divided professional growth into separate phases such as expansion (building self-identity during youth), investigation (trying out career choices in teen years), establishment (securing positions in initial adulthood), maintenance (maintaining roles in middle age), and withdrawal (gearing up for retirement in older stages) [7]. Super’s structure, quite impactful in the middle of the 20th century, stressed the realization of one’s self-identity in job roles but suffered from a lack of smooth connectivity among its parts, frequently appearing as a group of somewhat linked notions instead of a single integrated system [8]. Savickas worked to resolve this division by bringing in social constructionism as a guiding overarching concept, effectively combining these parts into a more unified and versatile model that considers the current realities of fluid professional lives [9]. CCT is positioned within the metatheory of social constructionism, uniting segmented career theories through this lens [10]. This advancement gained momentum in the early 2000s, with CCT being clearly defined to tackle rising issues like worldwide economic integration, tech disturbances, and the fading of long-term jobs in one company [11]. For example, Savickas’s 2002 statements updated Super’s classic phases by substituting the rigid “upkeep” stage with a more active “oversight” phase, recognizing the requirement for persistent adjustment, creativity, and cycling back through shorter periods of investigation and setup in reaction to unforeseen professional alterations [12]. By 2005, CCT had additionally woven in ideas of contextualism, depicting career progression not as an inner ripening process but as an adjustable interplay with outer surroundings, affected by societal, communal, and temporal elements [13]. This contextualist perspective stresses likely variations and mutual exchanges between people and their contexts, encouraging malleability—the ability for continuous individual and situational change [14]. Consequently, CCT proves especially applicable for varied groups, allowing the model to tackle structural obstacles like economic inequalities, ethnic disparities, and gender-related limitations that influence professional paths differently [15]. Through the years, CCT has progressed to merge aspects from associated frameworks like life-planning guidance, which concentrates on nurturing versatility, job readiness, dedication, and ongoing education, guaranteeing its pertinence in a time where professions are more and more unrestricted and self-directed [16]. CCT has had significant impact on theory, research, and practice since its proposal, focusing on how individuals build careers by imposing meaning on vocational behavior [17].

 Fundamental Elements of Career Construction Theory

CCT rests on three interconnected basic pillars—professional identity, career flexibility, and life motifs—which together clarify the substance (what), method (how), and drive (why) behind work-related conduct, offering a thorough viewpoint for grasping how people form and maintain satisfying careers [18]. These components represent vocational personality types, career adaptability, and life themes, addressing how the career world is made through personal constructivism and social constructionism [19].

 Professional Identity: The "What" of Professions

Professional identity includes a person's similarity or match to recognized job archetypes, blending factors like preferences, skills, requirements, and principles that affect the kinds of work atmospheres they pursue [20]. Although CCT respects John Holland's six-sided classification—grouping identities into practical, analytical, creative, communal, ambitious, and orderly types—it redefines these not as innate, unchangeable features but as communally built likenesses that arise from relational assessments and societal backgrounds [21]. This pillar enhances conventional person-setting match models, such as those by Lofquist and Dawis, by redirecting attention from objective pairing to personal self-identities, where individuals proactively realize their self-views through job selections [22]. For instance, someone with a "communal" professional identity might lean toward supportive fields, but CCT stresses how this likeness is molded by communal standing and group interactions, permitting adaptability across societies where feature assignments differ [23]. In application, advisors applying CCT could use preference assessments not to identify "genuine" preferences but to jointly form them, assisting clients in connecting their internal self-views with outer job truths and promoting a feeling of expansion rather than simple arrangement in their work identities [24]. Vocational personality is the first component of CCT, emphasizing life themes as a narrative expressing uniqueness [25].

 Career Flexibility: The "How" of Professions

Placed as the key feature of CCT, career flexibility indicates the psychosocial assets and preparedness people have to successfully manage both expected work duties, like readying for first employment entry, and unexpected modifications caused by job alterations, shifts, or individual difficulties [26]. This idea is put into practice via four linked aspects: awareness, which entails proactive preparation and recognition of upcoming career needs; ownership, emphasizing individual accountability and choice-making in forming one's direction; inquiry, propelling examination of possible identities and alternate positions; and assurance, showing self-confidence in carrying out selections and surmounting barriers [27]. Differing from Super's prior idea of career readiness as a straight-line advancement, CCT raises flexibility as a tool for self-management and change, allowing people to maneuver through major cycles (wide life phases) and minor cycles (particular shifts like employment loss or advancement) with endurance [28]. Research findings emphasize that elevated flexibility relates to improved results, including higher employment contentment, lessened tension during joblessness, and boosted job readiness in changing markets [29]. In unstable financial settings, such as those worsened by mechanization or health crises, flexibility acts as a safeguard, empowering individuals to loop back through exploratory stages and reestablish themselves, thereby converting possible interruptions into chances for development [30]. Career adaptability is the primary focus of CCT because it brings about change through self-regulation resources [31].

 Life Motifs: The “Why” of Professions

Life motifs constitute the storytelling heart of CCT, shedding light on the fundamental drives and aims that push people toward certain work directions by organizing their actions into logical accounts [32]. Stemming from Super’s self-identity assertion, these motifs emerge from the merging of individual concerns—such as addressing early conflicts or meeting unfulfilled desires—into directing aims that supply guidance and relevance [33]. CCT maintains that motifs are not separate features but arising patterns identified through tale-telling, where people record the interaction between self and community to clarify choices and maintain self-consistency [34]. For example, a repeating motif of “surmounting hardship” might appear in a professional change from business employment to business ownership, converting personal difficulties into work-related assets [35]. Advisors draw out motifs through story-based methods, attending to core parts in clients’ tales to uncover what really counts, thereby boosting unity, feasibility, and a sense of importance in one’s professional existence [36]. This pillar supplements the others by infusing professional identity and flexibility with personal profundity, guaranteeing that professions are not merely practical but deeply rewarding [37]. In CCT, the theme is what matters in the life story, viewing language as the means for building careers out of complex social interactions [38].

 Key Assertions and Growth Phases

CCT is expressed through 16 basic assertions that intertwine professional identity, career flexibility, and life motifs, providing a guiding structure for understanding career progression rather than strict forecasts [39]. Important assertions encompass:

1.     Professions develop within layered communal settings including natural surroundings, traditions, households, and temporal periods, where people are immersed and shaped by these backgrounds [40];

2.     Growth stems from mutual exchanges, with individuals as engaged creators who form their routes through malleability and deliberate impact [41];

3.     Work self-identities progress from youth, built through communal positions and standings that combine performer (action-oriented), representative (aim-focused), and creator (story-based) viewpoints [42];

4.     Flexibility assets aid in dealing with communal demands and individual shifts, stressing self-management over ripening [43]; and

5.     Life motifs change inner conflicts into outer aims, organizing selections and offering story continuity [44].

These propositions express the current statement of CCT, incorporating, revising, and expanding Super's vocational development theory [45]. In terms of growth, CCT modifies Super's phases to meet current demands: expansion concentrates on establishing early self-identities via family and initial encounters; investigation includes solidifying, detailing, and realizing choices through testing and refinement; setup involves steadying, strengthening, and progressing in positions that express the self; oversight substitutes upkeep with active refreshing, creating, and cycling to maintain pertinence amid alterations; and withdrawal encompasses slowing, preparing, and thoughtful life assessment for retirement [46]. This phased model integrates micro-cycles to accommodate irregular transitions, promoting adaptive alignment. It underscores that neglecting responsibilities may lead to future complications, especially as collective expectations evolve in response to socio-economic shifts [47]. CCT conceptualizes development as driven by adaptation to an environment rather than by maturation of inner structures [48].

 Uses in Professional Guidance and Methods

Career Construction Theory (CCT) frames career guidance as collaborative narrative co-creation, where clients and counselors jointly develop empowering stories to resolve uncertainties and conflicts. Clients bring personal stories, inviting counselors to co-author new ones by listening for vocational personality, career adaptability, and life themes. Counselors act as facilitators, not infallible experts, helping clients interpret life and work for success and satisfaction. Individuals build careers through small stories shared in response to questions, deconstructed to challenge limitations, and reconstructed into a life portrait or identity narrative, transforming tensions into intentions that structure careers. Language serves as a tool for navigating social interactions, with emerging themes shaping career paths.

The Career Construction Interview (CCI), a qualitative tool with six questions, uncovers: counseling goals (act), personality (actor), interests (agent), self-setting scripts (author), self-guidance (advice), and preoccupations (arc). Also known as the Career Style Interview, it enables dismantling restrictive beliefs and building adaptive narratives.

In the life-design framework, CCT promotes flexibility, employability, commitment, emotional intelligence, and lifelong learning via a narrative progression: constructing career views from personal stories, deconstructing to reveal self-limits and barriers, reconstructing a new self-career vision, and planning actions for transitions. Narratives integrate contextual elements like work history, education, family, culture, and values, illustrating person-environment interplay and life's complexity.

Techniques include storytelling, autobiographies, life-lines, guided fantasies, and card sorts to foster self-understanding, reflection, and lifelong adaptability.

CCT adapts to diverse contexts by addressing environmental influences and practitioner biases, aiding multicultural applications and overcoming barriers in evolving workplaces emphasizing flexibility and self-employment. Contextualism views career development as interactions between individual, environment, and perceptions, avoiding reductive analysis to preserve meaning.

In HRD, CCT shifts from organizational to individual career management, building self-direction via knowledge, adaptive mindsets (concern, control, curiosity, confidence), and support. HR provides ongoing career info and training; newer employees get self-assessment and networking help, seasoned ones employability enhancement and new challenges.

CCT integrates with models like Systems Theory Framework (STF), chaos theory, social cognitive career theory, contextual action theory, and dialogical self theory for comprehensive, sustainable growth. Applied at transitions (entry, exit, disruption), it navigates ambiguities and interdependencies via constructivism, appreciating typologies like Holland's.

CCT's 16 propositions rest on three components: actors (behaviors), agents (strivings), authors (explanations). It emphasizes career adaptability over personality, as a psychosocial resource for tasks, transitions, and traumas, with four dimensions: concern (planning), control (responsibility), curiosity (exploration), confidence (implementation) to enable change.

 Study Support and Assessments

A considerable amount of research backs CCT, with solid proof-based support for its flexibility and self-identity parts, as shown by confirmation studies of instruments like the Career Adapt-Abilities Measure, which show connections between the four aspects and favorable measures such as job readiness, existence contentment, and endurance across varied groups [58]. Account-centered explorations further confirm the function of life motifs in preserving self-unity and easing shifts, with qualitative information showing how tale-sharing boosts significance-creation [59]. Nonetheless, assessments point out CCT's advantages in explanatory merging—condensing discoveries from mind science and community studies—while observing restrictions in forecasting accuracy, as its assertions frequently act as after-the-fact clarifications rather than producing verifiable assumptions [60]. Overviews indicate that although growth and self-identity parts are thoroughly recorded, proof on duty sequence (e.g., initial achievement forecasting subsequent results) stays unclear owing to standard choice issues [61]. To progress, upcoming studies should focus on varied confirmations, long-term plans, and examinations of digital effects, such as tech-assisted professional instruments [62]. In its relatively short history, CCT has amassed a body of research primarily related to career adaptability [63].

 Latest Advancements (2023-2025)

By 2025, CCT keeps progressing with new studies stressing useful instruments, proof-based confirmations, and mergers with present-day concerns. A small-overview outlines progress in qualitative evaluation tools and method strategies of CCT, highlighting its importance in professional guidance during uncertainty. Research shows CCT's effectiveness in lessening professional worry among learners via focused methods, boosting mental health. Learning uses, like integrating into teaching spaces with story methods, have been investigated to increase expert assurance and deepen client comprehension. Extended guidance instances demonstrate how CCT nurtures a feeling of purpose, especially for underrepresented communities like women from minority backgrounds, by making clear work-related accounts. Wider examinations connect model and application, reviewing frameworks to show how CCT improves actual-world uses. These progressions strengthen CCT's flexibility for lasting growth and fair employment, matching worldwide patterns.

 Summary

To conclude, career construction theory supplies a strengthening viewpoint on professions as personally created accounts that merge professional identity, flexibility, and life motifs to cultivate endurance and relevance in a constantly shifting setting [64]. By enabling people to vigorously form their routes, CCT tackles contemporary hurdles, advancing self-determination, ongoing education, and communal input [65]. Its continuing progression guarantees importance for advisors, teachers, and experts dedicated to aiding varied, satisfying work existences [66].

 References

[1] Savickas, M. L. (2002). Career construction: A developmental theory of vocational behavior. In D. Brown & Associates (Eds.), Career choice and development (4th ed., pp. 149-205). Jossey-Bass.

[2] Savickas, M. L. (2005). The theory and practice of career construction. In S. D. Brown & R. W. Lent (Eds.), Career development and counseling: Putting theory and research to work (pp. 42-70). Wiley.

[3] Patton, W., & McMahon, M. (2014). Career development and systems theory: Connecting theory and practice (3rd ed.). Sense Publishers.

[4] Brown, D. (Ed.). (2002). Career choice and development (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

[5] Savickas, M. L. (2013). Career construction theory and practice. In R. W. Lent & S. D. Brown (Eds.), Career development and counseling: Putting theory and research to work (2nd ed., pp. 147-183). Wiley.

[6] Super, D. E. (1957). The psychology of careers. Harper & Brothers.

[7] Super, D. E. (1984). Career and life development. In D. Brown & L. Brooks (Eds.), Career choice and development (pp. 192-234). Jossey-Bass.

[8] Savickas, M. L. (1997). Career adaptability: An integrative construct for life-span, life-space theory. The Career Development Quarterly, 45(3), 247-259.

[9] Savickas, M. L., & Porfeli, E. J. (2012). Career Adapt-Abilities Scale: Construction, reliability, and measurement equivalence across 13 countries. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(3), 661-673.

[10] Reese, R. J. (2016). Career development theories. In I. Marini & M. A. Stebnicki (Eds.), The professional counselor’s desk reference (2nd ed., pp. 107-116). Springer.

[11] McMahon, M., & Watson, M. (Eds.). (2015). Career assessment: Qualitative approaches. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

[12] Brewer, E. W. (2018). Career theories and models. In M. A. Peters (Ed.), Encyclopedia of educational philosophy and theory. Springer.

[13] Document. (2019). Unpublished manuscript.

[14] Lee, C. I., Felps, W., & Baruch, Y. (2014). Toward a taxonomy of career studies through bibliometric visualization. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 85(3), 339-351.

[15] Yuen, M., & Yau, J. (2015). Relation of career adaptability to meaning in life and connectedness among adolescents in Hong Kong. Journal of Career Development, 42(2), 147-159.

[16] Coupland, C. (2004). Career definition and denial: A discourse analysis of graduate trainees’ accounts of career. Journal of Management Studies, 41(5), 771-788.

[17] Holland, J. L. (1997). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments (3rd ed.). Psychological Assessment Resources.

[18] Lofquist, L. H., & Dawis, R. V. (1991). Essentials of person-environment-correspondence counseling. University of Minnesota Press.

[19] Cochran, L. (1997). Career counseling: A narrative approach. Sage.

[20] Hackett, G., & Lent, R. W. (1992). Theoretical advances and current inquiry in career psychology. In S. D. Brown & R. W. Lent (Eds.), Handbook of counseling psychology (2nd ed., pp. 419-452). Wiley.

[21] Cohen-Scali, V., Pouyaud, J., Podgórny, M., Drabik-Podgórna, V., Aisenson, D., Bernaud, J. L., Guichard, J., & Rossier, J. (Eds.). (2018). Interventions in career design and education: Transformation for sustainable development and decent work. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

[22] Athanasou, J. A., & Van Esbroeck, R. (Eds.). (2008). International handbook of career guidance. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

[23] Savickas, M. L. (2011). Career counseling. American Psychological Association.

[24] Guichard, J. (2013). Life construction theory. In A. Di Fabio & J. G. Maree (Eds.), Psychology of career counseling: New challenges for a new era. Nova Science Publishers.

[25] Hartung, P. J. (2013). The life-span, life-space theory of careers. In S. D. Brown & R. W. Lent (Eds.), Career development and counseling (2nd ed., pp. 83-113). Wiley.

[26] Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S.-W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17-40.

[27] Savickas, M. L. (2001). A developmental perspective on vocational behavior: Career construction theory. Career Development Quarterly, 50(1), 43-47.

[28] Savickas, M. L. (2008). Helping people choose jobs: A history of the guidance profession. In J. A. Athanasou & R. Van Esbroeck (Eds.), International handbook of career guidance (pp. 97-113). Springer.

[29] McIlveen, P., & Patton, W. (2007). Dialogical self: Author and narrator of career life themes. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 7(2), 67-80.

[30] Savickas, M. L. (1989). Career-style interview: A contextualized approach to career counseling. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 36(4), 424-430.

[31] McAdams, D. P. (1993). The stories we live by: Personal myths and the making of the self. Guilford Press.

[32] McAdams, D. P. (1996). Personality, modernity, and the storied self: A contemporary framework for studying persons. Psychological Inquiry, 7(4), 295-321.

[33] Blustein, D. L., Schultheiss, D. E. P., & Flum, H. (2004). Toward a relational perspective of the psychology of careers and working: A social constructionist analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 64(3), 423-440.

[34] Valach, L., & Young, R. A. (2009). Action theory: A contextual approach to career research. Journal of Career Assessment, 17(1), 58-71.

[35] Young, R. A., & Valach, L. (1996). Action theory: A framework for career research and practice. In M. L. Savickas & W. B. Walsh (Eds.), Handbook of career counseling theory and practice (pp. 155-170). Davies-Black Publishing.

[36] Brown, S. D., & Lent, R. W. (Eds.). (2013). Career development and counseling: Putting theory and research to work (2nd ed.). Wiley.

[37] Hartung, P. J., & Subich, L. M. (2011). Developing self in work and career: Concepts, cases, and contexts. American Psychological Association.

[38] Niles, S. G., & Hartung, P. J. (2000). Emerging career theories. In D. A. Luzzo (Ed.), Career counseling of college students: An empirical guide to strategies that work (pp. 23-42). American Psychological Association.

[39] Young, R. A., Valach, L., Dillabough, J.-A., Dover, C., & Matthes, G. (1994). Career projects in family contexts: A qualitative investigation. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45(3), 251-265.

[40] Young, R. A., Valach, L., Ball, J., Paseluikho, M. A., Wong, Y. S., DeVries, R. J., McLean, H., & Turkel, H. (2001). Career development in adolescence as a family project. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48(2), 190-202.

[41] Young, R. A., Lynam, M. J., Valach, L., Novak, H., Brierton, I., & Christopher, A. (2000). Parent-adolescent conversations as action: A qualitative analysis of career development projects. Canadian Journal of Counselling, 34(4), 231-246.

[42] Young, R. A., Lynam, M. J., Valach, L., Novak, H., Brierton, I., & Christopher, A. (2001). Joint actions of parents and adolescents in career development projects. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48(2), 203-213.

[43] Hermans, H. J. M. (2002). The dialogical self: Toward a theory of personal and cultural positioning. Culture & Psychology, 8(1), 147-160.

[44] Hermans, H. J. M. (2003). The construction and reconstruction of a dialogical self. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 16(2), 89-130.

[45] Hogan, R. (1983). A socioanalytic theory of personality. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 30, 55-89.

[46] Richardson, M. S. (1993). Work in people’s lives: A location for counseling psychologists. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 40(4), 425-433.

[47] Cochran, L. (1990). The sense of vocation: A study of career and life development. State University of New York Press.

[48] Savickas, M. L. (2008). Report of framework and career construction theory. In J. A. Athanasou & R. Van Esbroeck (Eds.), International handbook of career guidance (pp. 215-238). Springer.

[49] Savickas, M. L., Nota, L., Rossier, J., Dauwalder, J.-P., Duarte, M. E., Guichard, J., Soresi, S., Van Esbroeck, R., & van Vianen, A. E. M. (2009). Life designing: A paradigm for career construction in the 21st century. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 75(3), 239-250.

[50] Di Fabio, A. (2014). The Life Design Genogram: A qualitative career assessment and intervention for the 21st century. In M. McMahon & M. Watson (Eds.), Career assessment: Qualitative approaches (pp. 87-96). Sense Publishers.

[51] Savickas, M. L. (2012). Life design: A paradigm for career intervention in the 21st century. Journal of Counseling & Development, 90(1), 13-19.

[52] McIlveen, P., & Patton, W. (2007). Narrative career counselling: Theory and exemplars of practice. Australian Psychologist, 42(3), 226-235.

[53] Savickas, M. L. (2015). Life-design counseling manual. Rootstown, OH: Vocopher.

[54] Gilley, J. W., Eggland, S. A., & Gilley, A. M. (2002). Principles of human resource development (2nd ed.). Perseus Publishing.

[55] McMahon, M., & Patton, W. (2006). Career development and systems theory: A new relationship (2nd ed.). Sense Publishers.

[56] Patton, W. (2008). Recent developments in career theories: The systems theory framework and career construction. In J. A. Athanasou & R. Van Esbroeck (Eds.), International handbook of career guidance (pp. 139-154). Springer.

[57] Blustein, D. L. (2011). A relational theory of working. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79(1), 1-7.

[58] Savickas, M. L., & Porfeli, E. J. (2011). Career Adapt-Abilities Scale: Development and validation. Journal of Career Assessment, 19(2), 130-145.

[59] Hartung, P. J. (2010). Practice and research in career counseling and development—2009. The Career Development Quarterly, 59(2), 98-142.

[60] Lent, R. W. (2013). Career-life preparedness: Revisiting career planning and adjustment in the new workplace. The Career Development Quarterly, 61(1), 2-14.

[61] Brown, S. D., & Hirschi, A. (2013). Personality, career development, and occupational attainment. In S. D. Brown & R. W. Lent (Eds.), Career development and counseling (2nd ed., pp. 299-328). Wiley.

[62] Sampson, J. P., Osborn, D. S., Dikel, M. R., & Sampson, M. G. (2020). Technology in career services: Creating a digital strategy for career centers. Journal of Career Development, 47(4), 357-371.

[63] Rudolph, C. W., Lavigne, K. N., & Zacher, H. (2017). Career adaptability: A meta-analysis of relationships with measures of adaptivity, adapting responses, and adaptation results. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 98, 17-34.

[64] Savickas, M. L. (2019). Career counseling (2nd ed.). American Psychological Association.

[65] Nota, L., & Rossier, J. (Eds.). (2015). Handbook of life design: From practice to theory and from theory to practice. Hogrefe Publishing.

[66] Maree, J. G. (2013). Counselling for career construction: Connecting life themes to construct life portraits. Sense Publishers.